February 20, 2004 - DrugSense Weekly (Web)
U.S. Rep. Ron Paul's Comments On The Persecution Of Pain
Doctors
Comments Made Before the U.S. House of Representatives: Feb.
12, 2004
Note: Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from
Texas.
Mr. Speaker, the publicity surrounding popular radio talk
show host Rush Limbaugh's legal troubles relating to his use
of the pain killer OxyContin hopefully will focus public attention
on how the federal drug war threatens the effective treatment
of chronic pain. Prosecutors have seized Mr. Limbaugh's medical
records to investigate whether he violated federal drug laws.
The fact that Mr. Limbaugh is a high profile, controversial,
conservative media personality has given rise to speculation
that the prosecution is politically motivated. Adding to this
suspicion is the fact that individual pain patients are rarely
prosecuted in this type of case.
In cases where patients are not high profile celebrities like
Mr. Limbaugh, it is pain management physicians who bear the brunt
of overzealous prosecutors. Faced with the failure of the war
on drugs to eliminate drug cartels and kingpins, prosecutors
and police have turned their attention to pain management doctors,
using federal statutes designed for the prosecution of drug dealers
to prosecute physicians for prescribing pain medicine.
Many of the cases brought against physicians are rooted in
the federal Drug Enforcement Administration's failure to consider
current medical standards regarding the use of opioids, including
OxyContin, in formulating policy. Opioids are the pharmaceuticals
considered most effective in relieving chronic pain. Federal
law classifies most opioids as Schedule II drugs, the same classification
given to cocaine and heroin, despite a growing body of opinion
among the medical community that opioids should not be classified
with these substances.
Unfortunately, patients often must consume very large amounts
of opioids to obtain long-term relief. Some prescriptions may
be for hundreds of pills and last only a month. A prescription
this large may appear suspicious. But according to many pain
management specialists, it is medically necessary in many cases
to prescribe a large number of pills to effectively treat chronic
pain. However, zealous prosecutors show no interest in learning
the basic facts of pain management.
This harassment by law enforcement has forced some doctors
to close their practices, while others have stopped prescribing
opioids altogether - even though opioids are the only way some
of their patients can obtain pain relief. The current attitude
toward pain physicians is exemplified by Assistant U.S. Attorney
Gene Rossi's statement that "Our office will try our best
to root out [certain doctors] like the Taliban."
Prosecutors show no concern for how their actions will affect
patients who need large amounts of opioids to control their chronic
pain. For example, the prosecutor in the case of Dr. Cecil Knox
of Roanoke, Virginia, told all of Dr. Knox's patients to seek
help in federal clinics even though none of the federal clinics
would prescribe effective pain medicine!
Doctors are even being punished for the misdeeds of their
patients. For example, Dr. James Graves was sentenced to more
than 60 years for manslaughter because several of his patients
overdosed on various combinations of pain medications and other
drugs, including illegal street drugs. As a physician with over
thirty years of experience in private practice, I find it outrageous
that a physician would be held criminally liable for a patient's
misuse of medicine.
The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons ( AAPS
), one of the nation's leading defenders of medical freedom,
recently advised doctors to avoid prescribing opioids because,
according to AAPS, "drug agents set medical standards."
I would hope my colleagues would agree that doctors, not federal
agents, should determine medical standards.
By waging this war on pain physicians, the government is condemning
patients to either live with excruciating chronic pain or seek
opioids from other, less reliable, sources - such as street drug
dealers. Of course opioids bought on the street likely will pose
a greater risk of damaging a patient's health than opioids obtained
from a physician.
Finally, as the Limbaugh case reveals, the prosecution of
pain management physicians destroys the medical privacy of all
chronic pain patients. Under the guise of prosecuting the drug
war, law enforcement officials can rummage through patients'
personal medical records and, as may be the case with Mr. Limbaugh,
use information uncovered to settle personal or political scores.
I am pleased that AAPS, along with the American Civil Liberties
Union, has joined the effort to protect Mr. Limbaugh's medical
records.
Mr. Speaker, Congress should take action to rein in overzealous
prosecutors and law enforcement officials, and stop the harassment
of legitimate physicians who act in good faith when prescribing
opioids for relief from chronic pain. Doctors should not be prosecuted
for using their best medical judgment to act in their patients'
best interests. Doctors also should not be prosecuted for the
misdeeds of their patients.
Finally, I wish to express my hope that Mr. Limbaugh's case
will encourage his many fans and listeners to consider how their
support for the federal war on drugs is inconsistent with their
support of individual liberty and constitutional government.
|