June 25, 2004 - The Wall Street Journal (US)
Ruling Puts Limits on Scope Of Judge's Sentencing Powers
By Laurie P. Cohen and Gary Fields
In a decision that could have major implications for the federal
sentencing system and for at least eight states, the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled that judges can't act alone to boost a defendant's
sentence based on facts and behavior that weren't presented to
a jury.
The high court, In a 5-4 vote, overturned the sentence of
a Washington state man sentenced to more than seven years in
prison for the 1998 kidnapping of his estranged wife. The state
judge in that case sentenced Ralph Howard Blakely Jr. to more
than three years above the 53-month maximum called for by the
state's sentencing guidelines, saying Mr. Blakely acted with
"deliberate cruelty."
Though the decision involved one state's sentencing system,
legal specialists said it could affect the guidelines enacted
by several other states, as well as the federal system.
(Remainder snipped at the request of The Wall Street
Journal)
|